SFS Suomen Standardit

 

This document specifies a method for the determination of the boiling range distribution of petroleum products. The method is applicable to petroleum products and fractions with a final boiling point of 538 °C or lower at atmospheric pressure as determined by this document. This document does not apply to gasoline samples or gasoline components. The method is limited to products having a boiling range greater than 55 °C and having a vapour pressure sufficiently low to permit sampling at ambient temperature. The document describes two procedures. a) Procedure A allows a larger selection of columns and analysis conditions, such as packed and capillary columns as well as a thermal conductivity detector in addition to the flame ionization detector. Analysis times range from 14 min to 60 min. b) Procedure B is restricted to only three capillary columns and requires no sample dilution. The analysis time is reduced to about 8 min. Both procedures have been successfully applied to samples containing fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) up to 20 % (volume fraction). NOTE For the purposes of this document, the terms “% (mass fraction)” and “% (volume fraction)” are used to represent the mass fraction (µ), the volume fraction (f) of a material.

 

This European Standard specifies the requirements and tests for the construction, performance, safety and conformity of conversion devices used to determine the energy of fuel gases described in the Table 1, including those of the 1st and 2nd families according to EN 437. The energy conversion device (ECD) considered in this standard consists of an energy calculator (EC) and is associated with the following devices and/or functions: - a volume conversion device (VCD) or a flow computer used as gas meter conversion, either conforming to EN 12405-1, or to prEN 12405-3, for high accuracy measurements; - a calorific value determination device (CVDD). Requirements for type approval tests of the devices, not included in the above-mentioned standards are described in appropriate annexes specified in Table 6. For the purpose of this European Standard, the term "volume conversion devices" (VCDs) includes flow computers (FCs). A single calculator may undertake the volume conversion functions for different metering lines.

 

This document defines a framework for assessing the quality of data governance and data management practices for participants in data spaces. It specifies the core principles, processes, and assessment elements that enable organizations to manage, monitor, and improve their data governance and data management practices. The framework comprises two components: • Process Reference Model: Defines key processes for data governance and data product management of data space participants, including its fundamental principles, structure, detailed process definitions, links to broader data governance, and required implementation measures. • Process Assessment Framework: Outlines a model to evaluate process capability by establishing six distinct quality levels expressed in terms of capability levels, describing the corresponding profiles and guiding the systematic assessment. This standard is aimed at supporting data governance and data management professionals, IT managers, quality assurance officers, and regulatory bodies. This standard is applicable to organizations of all types and sizes.

 

This document specifies a method for the determination of the boiling range distribution of petroleum products. The method is applicable to petroleum products and fractions with a final boiling point of 538 °C or lower at atmospheric pressure as determined by this document. This document does not apply to gasoline samples or gasoline components. The method is limited to products having a boiling range greater than 55 °C and having a vapour pressure sufficiently low to permit sampling at ambient temperature. The document describes two procedures. a) Procedure A allows a larger selection of columns and analysis conditions, such as packed and capillary columns as well as a thermal conductivity detector in addition to the flame ionization detector. Analysis times range from 14 min to 60 min. b) Procedure B is restricted to only three capillary columns and requires no sample dilution. The analysis time is reduced to about 8 min. Both procedures have been successfully applied to samples containing fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) up to 20 % (volume fraction). NOTE For the purposes of this document, the terms "% (mass fraction)" and "% (volume fraction)" are used to represent the mass fraction (µ), the volume fraction (f) of a material.

 

 

 

This document specifies the characteristics of self-locking clip nuts in FE-PA2601 (A286) for aerospace applications. Classification: 1 100 MPa /425 °C

 

This document specifies the characteristics of self-locking silver coated clip nuts in FE PA92HT for aerospace applications. Classification: 1 100 MPa /425 °C

 

This document specifies the characteristics of screws, pan head, offset cruciform recess, coarse tolerance normal shank, medium length thread, in alloy steel, cadmium plated. Classification: 1 100 MPa /235 °C

 

This document specifies the characteristics of screws, pan head, six lobe recess, coarse tolerance normal shank, medium length thread, in titanium alloy, anodized, MoS2 lubricated. Classification: 1 100 MPa /315 °C .

 

This document specifies the inspection rules and the cosmetic acceptance criteria for surfaces of aircraft cabin equipment. Surfaces are considered under the aspects of technical feasibility of the industrial design. This document outlines the framework between customers, suppliers or manufacturers and OEMs with regard to cosmetic issues. This document aims to: a) provide the supplier or manufacturer with quality criteria to be met during the production-, testing- and quality-inspection-process; b) guide customer, OEM and supplier or manufacturer quality assurance with a description of cosmetic standards for the following inspections: — supplier or manufacturer internal QA inspection; — first article inspection; — source inspection; — incoming inspection; — final assembly line, cabin inspection; — customer presentation.

 

This document specifies a common framework for audit trails for electronic health records (EHR), in terms of audit trigger events and audit data, to keep the complete set of personal health information auditable across information systems and domains. It is applicable to systems processing personal health information that create a secure audit record each time a user reads, creates, updates, or archives personal health information via the system. NOTE       Such audit records at a minimum uniquely identify the user, uniquely identify the subject of care, identify the function performed by the user (record creation, read, update, etc.), and record the date and time at which the function was performed. This document covers only actions performed on the EHR, which are governed by the access policy for the domain where the electronic health record resides. It does not deal with any personal health information from the electronic health record, other than identifiers, the audit record only containing links to EHR segments as defined by the governing access policy. It does not cover the specification and use of audit logs for system management and system security purposes, such as the detection of performance problems, application flaw, or support for a reconstruction of data, which are dealt with by general computer security standards such as ISO/IEC 15408 (all parts)[9]. Annex A gives examples of audit scenarios. Annex B gives an overview of audit log services.

 

This document specifies a common framework for audit trails for electronic health records (EHR), in terms of audit trigger events and audit data, to keep the complete set of personal health information auditable across information systems and domains. It is applicable to systems processing personal health information that create a secure audit record each time a user reads, creates, updates, or archives personal health information via the system. NOTE Such audit records at a minimum uniquely identify the user, uniquely identify the subject of care, identify the function performed by the user (record creation, read, update, etc.), and record the date and time at which the function was performed. This document covers only actions performed on the EHR, which are governed by the access policy for the domain where the electronic health record resides. It does not deal with any personal health information from the electronic health record, other than identifiers, the audit record only containing links to EHR segments as defined by the governing access policy. It does not cover the specification and use of audit logs for system management and system security purposes, such as the detection of performance problems, application flaw, or support for a reconstruction of data, which are dealt with by general computer security standards such as ISO/IEC 15408 [2] all parts. Annex A gives examples of audit scenarios. Annex B gives an overview of audit log services.

 

Tämä kansallinen standardi sisältää toimivuusvaatimukset sairaaloiden tai vastaavien hoitoyksiköiden potilaiden tai asukkaiden käyttöön tarkoitetuille pussilakanoille, lakanalle ja tyynyliinalle. Standardissa määritellään materiaalien oleelliset ominaisuudet ja minimi vaatimustaso sekä annetaan oleelliset tuotteiden mitat.

Huom. standardiehdotuksen taulukossa 5 on virhe. Oikeat mitat ovat: 
Leveys 160 cm (toleranssi 150...165 cm) x pituus 290 cm (toleranssi 280...300 cm).
Virhe korjataan ennen standardin vahvistamista SFS-standardiksi.

 

The System Package Data Exchange™ (SPDX®) specification defines an open standard for communicating bill of materials (BOM) information for different topic areas. SPDX defines an underlying data model as well as multiple serialization formats to encode that data model. SPDX metadata includes details about creation and distribution, including the following:

• software composition, for collections of software (Packages), individual Files, and portions of files (Snippets)

• software build information

• artificial intelligence (AI) models

• datasets

• creator, supplier and distributor identity information

• provenance and integrity

• licenses and copyrights, including a curated list of licenses and exceptions

• security vulnerabilities, defects, and other quality data

• relationships between system elements

• software usage and lifecycle

• mechanisms to enable annotating SPDX elements and linking between multiple SPDX Documents

 

This document defines quality measures for quantitatively evaluating product quality in terms of characteristics and subcharacteristics defined in ISO/IEC 25010 and is intended to be used together with ISO/IEC 25010. It can be used in conjunction with the ISO/IEC 2503n and the ISO/IEC 2504n standards or to more generally meet user needs concerning ICT products and software products quality. This document contains a basic set of quality measures for each characteristic and subcharacteristics. It includes, as informative annexes, considerations for the use of quality measures (Annex A), QMEs used to define product or system quality measures (Annex B), and a detailed explanation of measurement types (Annex C). This document does not provide the specific ranges of values of the measures to rated levels or grades of compliance because these values are determined based on the nature of the system, product, or a part of the product, and depending on factors such as the category of the software, integrity level, and users’ needs. Some attributes could have a desirable range of values, which does not depend on specific user needs but depends on generic factors; The proposed quality measures are primarily intended to be used for quality assurance and improvement of products during or post the development life cycle process. The main users of this document are people carrying out quality requirement specification and evaluation activities as part of the following: — development: including requirements analysis, design specification, coding, and testing through acceptance during the life cycle process; — quality management: systematic examination of the software product or computer system, for example, when evaluating system or software product quality as part of quality assurance, quality control, and quality certification; — supply: a contract with the acquirer for the supply of a system, software product, or software service under the terms of a contract, for example, when validating quality at qualification test; — acquisition: including product selection and acceptance testing, when acquiring or procuring a system, software product, or software service from a supplier; — maintenance: improvement of the software product or system based on quality measurement.

 

This document specifies requirements for the design and operation of surface-based observing networks used for the determination of GHG emissions in urban environments. It establishes protocols for measurements of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and carbon monoxide (CO) in the atmosphere. This document does not address measurements of nitrous oxide (N2O) and fluorinated gases (HFCs). NOTE CO is included because of its use as a proxy indicator gas for some widely used combustion sources, such as automobiles. This document establishes requirements for GHG concentration measurements in the incoming and outgoing air streams associated with an urban environment. This document is aimed to inform local and regional governments about how to assess GHG emissions within their jurisdictions, and about how to assess the impact of mitigation efforts undertaken by governments and private sector organizations to reduce GHG emissions.

 

This document specifies secure two-party and outsourced multi-party computation mechanisms based on the garbled circuits technique, including garbled circuit generation, garbled circuit evaluation, requirements for input labels, result reconstruction, and garbled circuits security instantiation.

 

This document specifies the properties of a screw, hexagon head, flanged, with six-lobe recess made of composite for aerospace cabin and non-structural applications. Due to the polymer material the screws can also be used to avoid damage to varnish and coatings beneath the washer while tightening the screw.

 

This document specifies the evaluation of computer vision systems, in the sense of measuring the quality of a system’s results to assess its functional suitability. It provides a definition of evaluation methods for those systems, together with guidance on how to select, implement and interpret those evaluation methods. This document covers quantitative metrics as well as other evaluation methods. It includes requirements on the implementation of the described metrics, and further requirements on the technical resources involved in the evaluation process.