Toimialayhteisöt

 

This document specifies accessibility requirements and recommendations for accessible charging stations for electric road vehicles, following a “Design for All”/“Universal Design” approach. This document applies to the charging infrastructure for M1 electric vehicles, which are used for the carriage of passengers and are equipped with at least four wheels and comprising not more than eight seats in addition to the driver's seat, and for N1 electric vehicles, which are used for the carriage of goods and having a maximum mass not exceeding 3,5 tonnes. This document sets out requirements and recommendations designed to ensure that the charging infrastructure is accessible and usable for all drivers, including those with specific mobility needs. Autonomous driving vehicles are excluded from the scope of this document. This document is applicable to charging infrastructures, whether public or private, intended for electric vehicle charging. While it primarily addresses requirements and recommendations for conductive charging, wireless/inductive charging is also considered where relevant. This document covers: — the built environment surrounding electric vehicle charging stations, including its location, identification, signage and information; — the built environment close to the electric vehicle to enable the charging process; — factors to be taken into account in the design and specification of electric vehicle supply equipment; — the platform and applications to enable the type of charging and payment, when relevant; — other possible basic services associated with the charging process: pedestrian connection, associated toilets, etc. This document does not cover: — electric vehicles categories other than M1 and N1, although its users could also benefit from the requirements given in this document; — specific materials used within an electric vehicle supply equipment; — definition of charging rates or charging prices; — user personal safety and protection; — grid connections for electric vehicle charging stations; — parking policy and planning policy related to designated accessible parking spaces or electric vehicle charging. NOTE Some of the requirements given in this document might not be applicable to private infrastructures (e.g. the ones related to the payment system).

 

This European Standard specifies the requirements and tests for the construction, performance, safety and conformity of conversion devices used to determine the energy of fuel gases described in the Table 1, including those of the 1st and 2nd families according to EN 437. The energy conversion device (ECD) considered in this standard consists of an energy calculator (EC) and is associated with the following devices and/or functions: - a volume conversion device (VCD) or a flow computer used as gas meter conversion, either conforming to EN 12405-1, or to prEN 12405-3, for high accuracy measurements; - a calorific value determination device (CVDD). Requirements for type approval tests of the devices, not included in the above-mentioned standards are described in appropriate annexes specified in Table 6. For the purpose of this European Standard, the term "volume conversion devices" (VCDs) includes flow computers (FCs). A single calculator may undertake the volume conversion functions for different metering lines.

 

This document defines a framework for assessing the quality of data governance and data management practices for participants in data spaces. It specifies the core principles, processes, and assessment elements that enable organizations to manage, monitor, and improve their data governance and data management practices. The framework comprises two components: • Process Reference Model: Defines key processes for data governance and data product management of data space participants, including its fundamental principles, structure, detailed process definitions, links to broader data governance, and required implementation measures. • Process Assessment Framework: Outlines a model to evaluate process capability by establishing six distinct quality levels expressed in terms of capability levels, describing the corresponding profiles and guiding the systematic assessment. This standard is aimed at supporting data governance and data management professionals, IT managers, quality assurance officers, and regulatory bodies. This standard is applicable to organizations of all types and sizes.

 

This document specifies dimensions and requirements for both open and closed suction catheters made of flexible materials and intended for use in suctioning of the respiratory tract. Suction catheters intended for use with flammable anaesthetic gases or agents, lasers or electrosurgical equipment are not covered by this document. NOTE For guidance on airway management during laser surgery of the upper airway, see ISO/TR 11991[4].

 

ISO 11737-1:2018 specifies requirements and provides guidance on the enumeration and microbial characterization of the population of viable microorganisms on or in a health care product, component, raw material or package. NOTE 1 The nature and extent of microbial characterization is dependent on the intended use of bioburden data. NOTE 2 See Annex A for guidance on Clauses 1 to 9. ISO 11737-1:2018 does not apply to the enumeration or identification of viral, prion or protozoan contaminants. This includes the removal and detection of the causative agents of spongiform encephalopathies, such as scrapie, bovine spongiform encephalopathy and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. NOTE 3 Guidance on inactivating viruses and prions can be found in ISO 22442-3, ICH Q5A(R1) and ISO 13022. ISO 11737-1:2018 does not apply to the microbiological monitoring of the environment in which health care products are manufactured.

 

ISO 21227-4:2008 describes a method for evaluating filiform corrosion by means of digital optical imaging. Only the evalution procedure is described. The filiform corrosion itself is produced in accordance with other standards.

 

This document specifies methods for determining the pot life of multi-part adhesives, in order to be able to determine whether the pot life conforms to the minimum specified working life required of an adhesive. The different methods described in this document to measure the property do not necessarily provide identical results. The test methods described are suitable for assessing all multi–part adhesives, and especially epoxy based and polyurethane based adhesives, but they are not suitable for some acrylic-based adhesives. NOTE 1       Some of the methods described in this document can also be suitable for determination of working life of one-part adhesives that react to humidity (e.g. PUR prepolymers). NOTE 2       This document can also be used for assessing non-structural adhesives.

 

This part of ISO 7250 provides worldwide and regional tables of design ranges for use with product standards for equipment design and safety that require ISO 7250 body measurement data input. Anthropometric data for technological design are used and presented in many standards. Therefore, it is critical to update and revise those values in a timely manner, as the body sizes and variation of member body populations change with time. Further, the schedule of member body anthropometric surveys varies widely. Many industrial products are developed for regional or worldwide markets without a clear presentation of regional and worldwide ISO 7250 design ranges. Users of standards require the most appropriate body measurement values for their intended applications. Together with iso:proj:84822ISO/TR 7250-2, which serves as a continuously updated data source for most current anthropometric data from individual member bodies, this part of ISO 7250 provides a periodically updated normative design values for worldwide and regional design ranges, with guidance on sex differences. This part of ISO 7250 is intended as the single source of normative anthropometric data for equipment design guidance in standards. In this part, data from all the member bodies found in iso:proj:84822ISO/TR 7250-2 are considered simultaneously, whereas in ISO/TR 7250-2, member body data are presented separately for each member body. While there are sources for individual member body data in iso:proj:84822ISO/TR 7250-2, most standards do not use individual member body data for technological specification. This part of ISO 7250 is to be used whenever normative worldwide or regional anthropometric data are needed. In cases when there are no suitable measurements in this part of ISO 7250, the methods and justifications used in arriving at regional and worldwide values from the body measurement data of individual populations can be used with suitable measurement data. The scope of this part of ISO 7250 is limited to the presentation of univariate design ranges of the type currently utilized in product standards (e.g. P1, P5, P95, and P99) and does not address shortcomings of using those values in multivariate designs. A separate standard on multivariate design is in preparation. In addition, this part of ISO 7250 does not address body measurements used in product standards that are not defined in iso:proj:65246ISO 7250-1. The methods used in developing this part of ISO 7250 do not take into account the population size or sampling methodology of the member bodies, so statistical values from a sparsely populated member body could set regional or worldwide upper or lower limits. The reader is referred to iso:proj:84822ISO/TR 7250-2 for details on sampling methods used in national surveys.

 

This document specifies requirements and provides guidance on the enumeration and microbial characterization of the population of viable microorganisms on or in a health care product, component, raw material or package. NOTE 1 The nature and extent of microbial characterization is dependent on the intended use of bioburden data. This document does not apply to the enumeration or characterization of viral, prion or protozoan contaminants. This includes the extraction and detection of the causative agents of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, such as scrapie, bovine spongiform encephalopathy and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. NOTE 2 Guidance on inactivating viruses and prions can be found in ISO 22442-3, ICH Q5A(R1) and ISO 13022. NOTE 3 ISO/TS 22456 provides specific guidance for bioburden testing for biologics and tissue-based products where this testing is conducted in relation to product sterilization. This document does not apply to the microbiological monitoring of the environment in which health care products are manufactured.

 

This document provides requirements for establishing a specification document for a finite element analysis (FEA) for a mechanical product, including type, procedure, modelling principle, solution, analysis and evaluation of the solution results, solution results interpretation, solution results report, and documentary management. It is applicable for FEA based structural analysis for mechanical products.

 

This document contains terms and definitions relating to oil and alternative fuel spills and their control. This document provides standardized terminology relating to oil and alternative fuel spill response, defined as the broad range of activities related to spill cleanup, including environmental conditions, assessment, sampling, containment, recovery, dispersant use, un situ burning, shoreline cleanup and disposal.

 

 

This standard applies to lidars installed on road vehicles to measure or detect the surroundings of the vehicle. This standard applies to lidars used on all types of road vehicles regardless of vehicle classifications, including passenger cars, buses, commercial vehicles, trailers, etc. NOTE The definition of “Road Vehicles” includes M1-M3, N1-N3, and L6-L7 according to Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3). This document specifies a series of test methods to assist in evaluating the performance of lidars, the tests should cover the following: 1. The common performance specifications (e.g., Range capability, Range precision) 2. The common performance characteristics (e.g., Anti-interference, Ghost points) 3. Possible alteration of performance test caused by environmental conditions 4. Lidar performance for the union of both ADAS or AD application scenarios This document does not specify test methods for reliability, functional safety, and cybersecurity. This document defines terms in the context of test methods for automotive lidar. This document provides an overview of applicable scenarios of automotive lidar (see Annex A).

 

This document outlines the concepts and principles for information management at a stage of maturity described as “information management according to ISO 19650”. This document provides recommendations for a framework to manage information including recording, versioning, organizing and making it available so that all actors achieve their objectives. This document is applicable to the whole life cycle of any asset, including strategic planning, initial design, engineering, development, documentation and construction, day-to-day operation, maintenance, refurbishment, repair and end-of-life. The framework can be adapted to assets or asset-related projects of any scale and complexity, so as not to hamper the flexibility and versatility that characterize the large range of potential procurement strategies and so as to address the cost of implementing this document.

 

This document specifies requirements for information management, in the form of a business process, within the whole life cycle of assets. This document can be applied to all types of assets, all stages of the asset life cycle, and all types of appointments, and applied by all types and sizes of organization.

 

This GNSS metrology document aims to provide a methodological reference framework for assessing the performance of GNSS based positioning terminals (GBPT) using GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems) technology. In this document, the GBPT is specifically used for various types of vehicles—such as cars, drones, trains, and ships—and not for any timing-related applications. This document is the first part of the ISO 25082 series, specifically developed to structure interactions with clients within the context of test engineering activities. It sets precise conditions for receiving client requests and presenting test results, thereby ensuring clear, effective communication that meets the expectations of both parties. The document defines and characterizes specific operational needs, then translates them into technical requirements, thereby forming a solid foundation for designing relevant and representative test scenarios for various use cases. The approach ensures that the systems tested not only meet operational expectations but also fulfill the desired functionalities for their intended applications. To ensure alignment between requirements and actual performance, the fundamental principle of an assessment is based on measuring the deviations between a reference trajectory, considered ideal but subject to measurement uncertainties, and the trajectories recorded by the Device Under Test (GBPT) to a representative scenario. This comparison process methodically quantifies key parameters such as the accuracy, availability, and reliability of GBPT, taking into account the diverse environmental and operational conditions they may face. In this context, the metrics commonly used to define performance are systematically identified, defined, and classified by their features. These metrics include positioning, velocity, and attitude errors, as well as indicators such as service continuity and availability, performance over time, and data reliability. Each of these metrics can play a critical role in evaluating the overall performance of a GNSS Based Positioning Terminal (GBPT) across varied and sometimes complex scenarios. These same metrics also serve as the basis for defining performance classes to be applied to establish a declaration of compliance. By structuring performance assessments around these indicators, it is possible to ensure that the obtained results meet normative requirements and align with the expectations of clients and certification authorities. Furthermore, this document defines the minimum requirements to consider before selecting the most appropriate testing method from a metrological perspective. The goal is to choose an approach that ensures the validity and reliability of measurements. In addition to their representativeness, the results are repeatable and reproducible from one test to another for the same GBPT and scenario. This methodological rigor is essential for obtaining consistent and comparable data. For the test results are presented in a structured manner to meet the client's expectations, especially in cases where the results shall comply with type certification requirements. Clarity, precision, and rigor in presenting the measured performance are indispensable to ensure that a GNSS Based Positioning Terminal meets the standards and regulations in effect. Finally, this document is primarily aimed at accredited testing laboratories responsible for applying it within the scope of their engineering testing services. It defines the minimum requirements needed to ensure clear and effective communication with fitness-for-purpose-based clients and stakeholders. By rigorously applying these requirements, any organization seeking to plan GNSS tests can optimize the efficiency of its processes while ensuring the production of reliable and accurate results.

 

 

This document specifies the measurement of displacements by means of geodetic instruments carried out for geotechnical monitoring. It refers to position measurements where a signal travels through air/the atmosphere between an instrument and a measuring point (target). General rules of performance monitoring of the ground, of structures interacting with the ground, of geotechnical fills and of geotechnical works are presented in ISO 18674-1:2015. This document is applicable to measurements carried out for monitoring purposes by means of: — tachymeter (manual or robotic ); — level; In informative annexes, this document also refers to principles of some techniques that are commonly used for the monitoring of displacements of topographic surfaces: — satellite Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR); satellite Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR); terrestrial radar interferometry ; — laser scanning; — GNSS. NOTE 1 This document fulfils the requirements for the performance monitoring of the ground, of structures interacting with the ground and of geotechnical works by the means of geodetic instruments as part of the geotechnical investigation and testing in accordance with References [1] and [2]. NOTE 2 A key element of any and all monitoring is the ability to reflect the reality of what one intends to measure. There is a wide discrepancy and disagreement between the terms used to call this ability, depending on the field of application and country of origin. ISO/IEC guide 99:2007 defines terms for measurements of one quantity values, whereas in monitoring we generally try to measure change between quantity over time. The terms approaching best our needs in ISO/IEC seems to be “Precision” and “Uncertainty”.

 

This document defines the design, safety and operation characteristics of gaseous hydrogen land vehicle (GHLV) refuelling connectors having flow capacities greater than 120 g/s. GHLV refuelling connectors consist of the following components, as applicable: — receptacle and protective cap (mounted on vehicle); — nozzle; — communication hardware. This document is applicable to refuelling connectors which have nominal working pressures or hydrogen service levels up to 70 MPa. This document is not applicable to refuelling connectors dispensing blends of hydrogen with natural gas.

 

ISO 9225:2012 specifies methods for measuring the parameters needed for corrosivity estimation used for classification of the corrosivity of atmospheres in ISO 9223. ISO 9225:2012 specifies methods for the measurement of environmental parameters for normative corrosivity estimation based on calculated first-year corrosion rates of standard metals, and informative corrosivity estimation based on characterization of the exposure environment. It does not describe the usual analytical techniques for the measured parameters since this depends on the available analytical techniques used in laboratories. Specific methods for deposition measurement of SO2 and Cl- deposition rates and conversional factors for comparison of different measuring methods are given.