Toimialayhteisöt

 

This document specifies requirements and recommendations for measuring the composition of CO2 streams during post capture pipeline transportation. The primary objective of this document is to establish standardized technical requirements and recommendations necessary for implementing regulations, commercial contracts, inventory ownership and fiscal transactions within the framework of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). This document includes measurements up to the storage injection points but does not cover Measurement, Monitoring, and Verification (MMV) once the CO2 has entered the geological storage complex. The differentiation between biogenic and non-biogenic CO2 in a CO2 stream is recognized as highly relevant for accounting purposes. However, the measurement methodologies for the biogenic CO2 fraction fall outside the scope of this document, which covers post-capture pipeline transportation. This document is not intended to differentiate between biogenic CO2 and CO2 produced from non-biogenic sources.

 

Specifies the method for determining the ability of sheet and strip to undergo plastic deformation in reverse bending. Can be applied to aluminium and its alloys only after previous agreement. The reverse bend test consists of repeated bending through 90 , in opposite directions, of a rectangular test piece held at one end, each bend being over a cylindrical support of specified radius.

 

This document specifies the purpose, conditions and methods for the test of civil small multi-copter unmanned aircraft (UA) docking system, including the inspection of basic characteristics, functional test, performance test, environmental adaptability compatibility test, and electromagnetic compatibility test. This document is applicable to docking systems of civil small multi-copter UA with maximum take-off mass (MTOM) level II through IV as defined in ISO 21895. The general requirements of civil small multi-copter UA docking system are documented in ISO 25215. Testing for other types of multi--copter UA docking systems might be performed in accordance with this document.

 

This document specifies two methods for determining the gas-transmission rate of single-layer plastic film or sheet and multi-layer structures under a differential pressure. One method uses a pressure sensor, the other a gas chromatograph, to measure the amount of gas which permeates through a test specimen.

 

 

This document specifies the characteristics and corresponding test methods for additive post treated and (polymer, silica) encapsulated aluminium pigments or combinations of both, suitable for use in paints.

 

This International Standard specifies methods for the measurement of the acidity of aromatic isocyanates and prepolymers used as polyurethane raw materials. Method A is a straightforward titration without a blank and is primarily applicable to products derived from crude or modified methylene-bis-(4-phenylisocyanate), polymethylene polyphenylisocyanates and toluene diisocyanate having moderate to high (> 100 µg/g ) levels of acidity. Method B is applicable to refined, crude or modified isocyanates derived from methylene-bis-(4-phenylisocyanate), polymethylene polyphenylisocyanate and toluene diisocyanate having low (< 100 µg/g ) levels of acidity, and a blank is employed. These methods can also be used for isomeric mixtures of toluene diisocyanate, methylene-bis-(4-phenylisocyanate) and polymethylene polyphenylisocyanate. Other aromatic isocyanates may be analysed by this method if precautions are taken to verify suitability.

 

This document specifies the design characteristics of the indications for people in the vicinity of earth-moving machines, as defined in cen:proj:68778EN ISO 6165:2022 . Co-workers who lack the training to interpret the indications are considered bystanders. While this document primarily addresses indications to bystanders, additional guidance for co-workers is provided in Annex B . This document does not apply to: Machines in roading applications; — Indications within the operator station or on devices (e.g. remote-control device, remote monitoring device) for the use by the operator in operating or monitoring the machine. This document does not provide requirements for the control method (i.e. software, hardware) of the indicator. NOTE Where regional or national regulations exist, those take priority and the colour displayed or flashing characteristics can be changed.

 

This document provides a method for the determination of lithium carbonate content in lithium carbonate. This document is applicable to the determination of lithium carbonate content in lithium carbonate. Measurement range: greater than 95,00 %.

 

This part of ISO 17660 is applicable to the welding of weldable reinforcing steel and stainless reinforcing steel of load-bearing joints, in workshops or on site. It specifies requirements for materials, design and execution of welded joints, welding personnel, quality requirements, mechanical testing. This document also covers welded joints between reinforcing steel bars and other steel components, such as connection devices and insertion anchors, including prefabricated assemblies. Non-load-bearing joints are covered by ISO 17660-2. This document is not applicable to factory production of welding fabric and lattice girders using multiple spot-welding machines or multiple projection welding machines. This document is applicable to static loaded structures. For fatigue-loaded structures, an appropriate reduction in fatigue strength should be taken into account.

 

This part of ISO 17660 is applicable to the welding of weldable reinforcing steel and stainless reinforcing steel of non-load-bearing welded joints, in workshops or on site. It specifies requirements for materials, design and execution of welded joints, welding personnel, quality requirements, examination and testing. Load-bearing welded joints are covered by ISO 17660-1.

 

This document specifies the method for the determination of magnetic metal impurities content in lithium carbonate. This document is applicable to the determination of nickel (Ni), iron (Fe), chromium (Cr) and zinc (Zn) in magnetic metal impurities. Total metallic magnetic impurities measurement range: 5 µg/kg ~ 1 000 µg/kg.

 

 

This document is aimed at those organisations wanting to create, fair, valid and reliable assessments in any context. The word high-stakes is often used, as opposed to low-stakes exams which are used in a formative context. The document takes a user through the process that they need to go through to create assessments and also identifies key roles within the assessment process. This Standard provides comprehensive guidelines on the application of information technology (IT) in delivering assessments. It outlines the scope of IT usage across various types of assessments, detailing the life cycle stages, security protocols, and privacy considerations specific to IT-enabled assessments.

 

The standard covers a broad range of assessment types, each tailored to specific contexts and objectives. These types of assessments ensure that the standard can be applied across various domains, from education to professional certification, and each has distinct characteristics and requirements. The key aspect of this is that the exams are high-stakes and have some specific use case, rather than for formative assessment, which typically has less rigorous requirements for creation and delivery. The primary types of assessment covered in the standard: a) K-12 Assessments b) Academic Assessments c) Employment Testing d) Professional Certification

 

The assessment lifecycle is a comprehensive process that encompasses the various stages involved in the creation, implementation, and evaluation of assessments. Although assessment procedures vary, the typical life cycle of assessment consists of the following steps: a) identification of need to assess b) design of outcomes/rubrics/assessment methodology c) creation, preparation and calibration of content d) preparation of assessment content (includes computer adaptive test engine/model) e) registration (may include payment) f) distribution g) authentication (includes identification) h) delivery i) response return (and/or submission) j) irregularities k) scoring, result determination and/or feedback l) data return m) analysis n) appeals and o) credentialing (certification, licensure, degree, badge, micro-credential, etc.) The design and instruments for computer adaptive testing and assessment methodology are not covered by this Standard. However, when IT is used for delivery, the relevant clauses of this Standard should be considered during the lifecycle.

 

The emphasis throughout this Standard is on the additional and distinct measures required with the integration of modern IT in assessment systems. While measures that are common to both traditional paper-based and IT-delivered assessments are mentioned only in general terms, this Standard addresses the novel challenges and opportunities introduced by digital technologies. This edition expands on the previous version by incorporating advanced technologies that were not previously covered. These include, but are not limited to, AI-assisted scoring, automatic feedback systems, adaptive testing, and remote proctoring solutions. The use of IT now supports a more comprehensive range of assessment functions: AI-Based Automated Scoring and Feedback: Modern systems employ machine learning algorithms to provide instant scoring and multi-dimensional feedback. Although the quality and validity of the assessment content remain paramount, IT is now capable of offering detailed, rubric-based evaluations that can be reviewed and validated by human markers. Adaptive Testing and Dynamic Item Banking: The introduction of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) and robust item banking systems allows assessments to adjust in real time to the test-taker’s ability, ensuring a more personalized and efficient measurement of competency. IT supports the maintenance and continuous updating of these item banks, including automatic generation and statistical calibration of test items. Remote Proctoring and Data Security: The transition to online assessments has necessitated the incorporation of remote proctoring technologies that combine AI monitoring with human oversight to mitigate fraud while safeguarding student privacy. This Standard specifies requirements for secure data transmission, storage, and compliance with international data protection regulations such as GDPR and ISO/IEC 27001. Learning Analytics and Data-Driven Decision Making: IT now plays a significant role in collecting and analyzing assessment data, enabling educators to leverage learning analytics for real-time feedback, formative assessment, and instructional adjustments. The interface between assessment content and IT delivery is enhanced to support a data-driven approach to both scoring and pedagogical decision-making. It is important to note that this Standard does not address the purely pedagogical aspects of assessment design or the intrinsic quality of assessment content. Rather, it focuses on the IT mechanisms that implement pedagogical decisions, facilitate the efficient transmission and secure handling of assessment data, and enable innovative evaluation methods. Compliance with this Standard does not imply that an assessment is pedagogically robust; rather, it ensures that the IT infrastructure supporting the assessment adheres to best practices in security, transparency, and reliability. The scope includes: IT scoring systems that are designed for subsequent human review; The IT-facilitated transmission and delivery of assessments, where responses may be scored either automatically or by human markers; The provision of automated feedback and immediate result reporting, while result-determination processes requiring human judgment remain outside this scope. By addressing these enhanced IT aspects, this Standard aims to support the evolution of assessment practices in a digital age, ensuring that technological innovations are harnessed effectively while maintaining the validity and fairness of the assessment process.

 

The aim of this Standard is to articulate overarching principles and best practices without prescribing specific technical implementations. The recommendations can be achieved through a variety of technological or procedural approaches, reflecting the expanded range of modern IT applications—including AI-assisted scoring, adaptive testing, and remote proctoring—without being tied to any specific hardware or software platform. In many instances, the principles outlined herein may be supplemented by additional regulations set by assessment providers, ensuring that while the underlying IT-enabled processes evolve, the core values of validity, fairness, and security remain paramount. 1.6 Compliance Assessment sponsors, assessment distributors and assessment centres may claim compliance with this Standard if they comply with all the clauses or subclauses applicable to their role (see table below). Notes to the clauses indicate the role(s) to which each clause or subclause is applicable. This Standard is applicable to both high-stakes and low-stakes assessments, but some clauses or subclauses are applicable only to high-stakes assessments; this is indicated in Table 1. The scenarios given in Annex A illustrate how different types of organisation might need to comply with different clauses of this Standard.

 

This document specifies the determination of total luminous transmittance and total luminous reflectance on clear, translucent or opaque plastics. Specimen shapes include moulded plaque or discs, films and sheets. Fluorescent plastics and chromatic colour plastics are not covered by this document. NOTE The scope of ISO 13468-1 [1]shows that ISO 13468-1 [1] covers planar transparent and substantially colourless plastics. The method in this document provide the way to trap diffused light and covers to measure translucent and opaque plastics.

 

This Standard defines how the Natural Language Interaction Protocol (NLIP) should be implemented over the base transfer protocol of AMQP. The exemplar use-cases for NLIP implementation over AMQP are out of scope of this Standard.

 

This Standard establishes the Agent Security Profiles for NLIP as a standalone Ecma Standard. Each Security Profile defines a set of mandatory security requirements for an agent implementing NLIP. Conformance to this Standard is mandatory for any implementation claiming NLIP conformance. Details on how the security guidelines described in this Standard should be implemented are out of scope of this Standard. This Standard does not cover aspects related to internals of foundation-models, safeguards for physical data centers, or issues related to national export controls.

 

 

This Standard defines the specifications of Natural Language Interaction Protocol (NLIP), which is an application-level communication protocol defined between AI Agents or between a human and an AI agent. The motivation, the design philosophy, exemplar use-cases, and examples of sample exchanges using the NLIP protocol are out of scope of this Standard.

 

This Standard defines how the Natural Language Interaction Protocol (NLIP) should be implemented over the base transfer protocol of HTTP or HTTPS. The exemplar use-cases for NLIP implementation over HTTP or HTTPS are out of scope of this Standard.