Toimialayhteisöt

 

 

This document defines the minimum specification of the pyrotechnic device pocket interface.

 

This document defines the general minimum specifications of a type 2 two-way connection interface, linking the pyrotechnic device and harness connector built into a road vehicle.

 

This document defines events and associated information elements that are used for tracking and tracing of all types of cargo in the maritime domain. This does not include passengers or crew. The document also defines information exchanges and information elements based on the ISO 28005 framework. The document is an elaboration of the UNECE “Business Requirements Specification for Integrated Track and Trace for Multi-Modal Transportation” with its inherent assumptions, which are: All transportation is related to a trade transaction between a seller and a buyer of goods that results in one or more shipments. Therefore, all tracking and tracing and events described in this document ultimately also “link” with these shipments. There is no present need for additional data identifiers to facilitate multi-modal tracking and tracing of trade shipments or the linked transportation in scope for this document. See below this bullet list. Identifiers for trade items, cargo, their packaging or container, or means of transport will support multi-modal tracking and tracing, if the identifiers are globally unique. Linkages can be made between the different identifiers using various existing technologies. The model supports tracking and tracing using various existing technologies by using the most relevant waypoints for the transport journey (as agreed among stakeholders). Standardized exchange processes may be used, without the need to create new class diagrams or new message structures. The operational scope covers the voyage of the ship, via the terminal, up to and including the gate-in event or gate-out event in the terminal. Gate-in and gate-out events include transfers between the maritime terminal and hinterland modes of transport such as road vehicles, feeder ships, inland waterway barges or rail wagons. The document aims to cover all kinds of cargoes carried on maritime ships. Cargo moves through ports in two main directions: Coming in from sea to be transported to destinations in the hinterland of the port. Coming in from the hinterland to be transported to overseas destinations on maritime ships. For the purposes of this document, we will ignore the transshipment scenario where the cargo comes in on maritime ships and also leaves on maritime ships from and to destinations that are not considered part of the hinterland of the port. The supply chain events that occur outside the boundaries of gate in and gate out mentioned above are not in scope for this document. It is recognised that the transport-related operations covered in the scope of this document are an integral part of the end-to-end supply chain between seller and buyer. Therefore, the requirements outlined in this document will follow standards and "best practices" already in use in the supply chain. This is also driven by the fact that there are critical hand-overs between the wider supply chain and the operations in scope for this document at the gate in and gate out processes that require unambiguous exchange of information related to the critical events in those processes.

 

This document provides guidance for data collection and validation for the calculation of the carbon footprint for lithium products. This document encourages disclosure of the databases, software, yields, distribution methods and data quality rating used in the calculation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions when producing lithium products from various lithium resources and produced by various processes, including its distribution, in order to verify the calculated values of GHG emissions. This document is not intended for the disclosure of GHG emissions for individual stages of the product manufacturing process.

 

 

This document specifies the performance criteria and requirements of a three-way connection interface, including ground connection, linking the pyrotechnic device and harness connector built into a road vehicle. Performance criteria and requirements are defined for a sealed variant of the pyrotechnic device/initiator harness connector assembly (see Annex A). Performance criteria and requirements are defined for a two-way (without ground) variant of the pyrotechnic device/initiator harness connector assembly (see Annex B). Performance criteria and requirements are defined for a variant without a retainer of the pyrotechnic device/initiator harness connector assembly is defined (see Annex C).

 

The proposed standard contains six grades of praseodymium-neodymium metal. It specifies the classifications, chemical compositions, appearance quality, markings and other requirements for praseodymium-neodymium metal. It includes a table of related grades of praseodymium-neodymium metal which are recognized in worldwide industrial applications. This International Standard is applicable to praseodymium-neodymium metal prepared by molten salt electrolysis process only and does not include requirements for praseodymium-neodymium metal produced by re-melting or other technology methods.

 

This document specifies a device and a method for the determination of the image quality of radiographs using wire-type image quality indicators.

 

This document establishes minimum performance, classification, and labelling requirements for gloves worn by operators and re-entry workers handling pesticide products to protect the hands or hands and forearms against contact with those products. Gloves covered by this document include gloves made with elastomeric and polymeric materials in the areas that provide protection. This document does not address protection against fumigants. This document needs to be used in conjunction with ISO 21420.

 

This document provides a temporal management reference model for feature-based software and systems product line engineering (feature-based PLE) as defined in ISO/IEC 26580:2021, expanding on the basic configuration management operations, tasks, and methods specified there. Because a PLE factory in ISO/IEC 26580 aggregates shared assets across multiple lifecycle stages and tools, such as requirements, models, source code, mechanical design, electrical design, documentation, test cases, calibration data, and so forth, the version management capabilities of the different lifecycle disciplines, as well as the feature catalogue and bill-of-features portfolio, need to be integrated into a holistic solution. We refer to this integrated PLE factory solution as Temporal Management (TM). As the name implies, the scope of temporal management is product line variation in time, in the context of feature-based PLE as prescribed in ISO/IEC 26580. The reference model for temporal management specifies an alignment-of-systems, where the temporal management system is an aggregation of the constituent version management systems for each of the individual elements in a PLE factory, including shared assets across all lifecycle stages, the feature catalogue, and the bills-of-features. Version management for each of the individual elements in the PLE factory is handled by the version management tools and methods associated with each of the elements, which are elaborated elsewhere and not repeated in this document.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][10][11] Appendix A provides harmonization with this document and these representative version management methods, in the context of broader systems and software configuration management standards. Organizations may incorporate an overall temporal management approach for their temporal management solution that best matches their engineering processes, such as ASME Y14.35[5] and ASME Y14.100[6] for organizations primarily focused on mechanical engineering processes or IEEE Std 828[4] for organizations primarily focused on systems and software engineering processes. The intended audience for this document comprises: — technology providers who wish to provide temporal management for their feature-based PLE factory; — champions within an organization who wish to introduce feature-based PLE into their organization; — IT staff within a PLE organization who introduce and maintain the necessary technology to support temporal management in feature-based PLE; — practitioner stakeholders who use the temporal management tools and methods to practice feature-based PLE; — technical and business managers who sponsor and direct the methods necessary to practice temporal management in feature-based PLE; — university professors, researchers, corporate trainers, and other educators who create and share pedagogical materials and benefits regarding temporal management in feature-based PLE.

 

This document specifies a test method and the minimum requirements for virucidal activity of chemical disinfectant products that form a homogeneous, physically stable preparation when diluted with hard water – or in the case of ready-to-use products – with water. This document is applicable to products that are used in the medical area for disinfecting non-porous surfaces including surfaces of medical devices by wiping or mopping – regardless if they are covered by the Medical Device Regulation [1] or not. Due to the new methods of application of surface disinfectants like pre-impregnated wipes this document was established to cover the different application methods. This document is applicable for four methods of application of products for wiping and/or mopping: a) soaking any non-specified wipe or mop with product; b) spraying the product on any non-specified wipe and / or mop or a specified wipe or mop; c) impregnation of specified wipes or mops by the user with the product according to the manufacturer’s recommendation; d) pre-impregnation of specified wipes or mops by the manufacturer as ready-to-use wipes or mops. In all types of application the water control has to be conducted with the standard wipe (5.3.2.17 a), because it is process or method control. The contact time for the water control is no longer than 5 min. This document does not apply to products that are sprayed on or used for flooding of surfaces, without wiping or mopping during the contact time. In this case, the methods of phase 2/ step 2 without mechanical action apply. The test-surface (5.3.2.16) was selected as a standard surface and should cover all non-porous surfaces. It was not intended to cover the influence of each different surface. This document is applicable to areas and situations where disinfection is medically indicated. Such indications occur in patient care, for example: — in hospitals, in community medical facilities and in dental institutions; — in clinics of schools, of kindergartens and of nursing homes; and can occur in the workplace and in the home. It can also include services such as laundries and kitchens supplying products directly for the patients. NOTE This method corresponds to a phase 2, step 2 test. EN 14885 specifies in detail the relationship of the various tests to one another and to “use recommendations”.

 

This document establishes a vocabulary of terms and semantics for all fields of respiratory care involving mechanical ventilation, such as intensive-care ventilation, anaesthesia ventilation, emergency and transport ventilation and home-care ventilation, including sleep-apnoea breathing-therapy equipment. It is applicable — in lung ventilator and breathing-therapy device standards, — in health informatics standards, — for labelling on medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems, — in medical electrical equipment and medical electrical system instructions for use and accompanying documents, — for medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems interoperability, and — in electronic health records. This document is also applicable to those accessories intended by their manufacturer to be connected to a ventilator breathing system or to a ventilator, where the characteristics of those accessories can affect the basic safety or essential performance of the ventilator and ventilator breathing system. NOTE This document can also be used for other applications relating to lung ventilation, including non-electrical devices and equipment, research, description of critical events, forensic analysis and adverse event (vigilance) reporting systems. This document does not specify terms specific to breathing-therapy equipment, or to physiologic closed-loop ventilation, high-frequency ventilation or negative-pressure ventilation; nor to respiratory support using liquid ventilation or extra-corporeal gas exchange, or oxygen, except where it has been considered necessary to establish boundaries between bordering concepts.

 

This International Standard specifies two test methods for evaluating the antimicrobial activity of products to be marketed for contact lens disinfection by chemical means and for products that are part of a contact lens care regimen. This International Standard is not applicable to the hygienic management of trial lenses. NOTE General disinfection product standards are not applicable to contact lens care products, e.g. EN 1040:1997 and EN 1275:1997.

 

 

This part of EN 196 describes the method for the determination of the compressive and, optionally, the flexural strength of cement mortar. The method applies to common cements and to other cements and materials, the standards for which call up this method. It may not apply to other cement types that have, for example, a very short initial setting time. The method is used for assessing whether the compressive strength of cement is in conformity with its specification and for validation testing of a CEN Standard sand, EN 196 1, or alternative compaction equipment. This part of EN 196 describes the reference equipment and procedure and allows alternative compaction equipment and procedures to be used provided that they have been validated in accordance with the appropriate provisions in this document. In the event of a dispute, only the reference equipment and procedure are used.

 

This document gives guidance on methods for determining and classifying the durability of wood and wood-based materials against biological wood-destroying agents. The methods can be applied to individual wood species and processed wood-based materials, including thermally and chemically modified, and water-repellent impregnated wood. Examples of wood-based materials are oriented strand boards (OSB), particle boards, fibre boards, laminated veneer lumber (LVL), and plywood. However, this document is not intended to give guidance on methods for determining and classifying the durability of wood products, coated wood, and wood polymer composites. Preservative-treated wood is not within the scope of this document, since requirements for the effectiveness of wood preservatives and durability requirements of wood treated with preservatives are regulated in several other European standards. However, this does not apply to modified wood, which is why it is included in the scope of this document. The wood-destroying agents considered in this document are: — wood-decay fungi (basidiomycete and soft-rot fungi); — beetles capable of attacking dry wood; — termites; — marine organisms capable of attacking wood in service. Data on the biological durability of the heartwood of selected wood species considered of economic importance in European countries are presented in Annex A (informative), which also provides information relating to their geographical origin, density, sapwood width and treatability. NOTE Treatability, durability to disfiguring fungi, permeability to water and performance in use of wood and wood-based materials are also important issues. However, because standardized methods aiming to assess and classify these factors do not exist and/or have not been extensively experienced yet, preliminary guidance is given in Annex B (informative) for the classification of wood treatability with aqueous wood preservatives, Annex C (informative) for the classification of the permeability to water, and Annex D (informative) for the durability to disfiguring fungi.