Toimialayhteisöt

 

This document defines events and associated information elements that are used for tracking and tracing of all types of cargo in the maritime domain. This does not include passengers or crew. The document also defines information exchanges and information elements based on the ISO 28005 framework. The document is an elaboration of the UNECE “Business Requirements Specification for Integrated Track and Trace for Multi-Modal Transportation” with its inherent assumptions, which are: All transportation is related to a trade transaction between a seller and a buyer of goods that results in one or more shipments. Therefore, all tracking and tracing and events described in this document ultimately also “link” with these shipments. There is no present need for additional data identifiers to facilitate multi-modal tracking and tracing of trade shipments or the linked transportation in scope for this document. See below this bullet list. Identifiers for trade items, cargo, their packaging or container, or means of transport will support multi-modal tracking and tracing, if the identifiers are globally unique. Linkages can be made between the different identifiers using various existing technologies. The model supports tracking and tracing using various existing technologies by using the most relevant waypoints for the transport journey (as agreed among stakeholders). Standardized exchange processes may be used, without the need to create new class diagrams or new message structures. The operational scope covers the voyage of the ship, via the terminal, up to and including the gate-in event or gate-out event in the terminal. Gate-in and gate-out events include transfers between the maritime terminal and hinterland modes of transport such as road vehicles, feeder ships, inland waterway barges or rail wagons. The document aims to cover all kinds of cargoes carried on maritime ships. Cargo moves through ports in two main directions: Coming in from sea to be transported to destinations in the hinterland of the port. Coming in from the hinterland to be transported to overseas destinations on maritime ships. For the purposes of this document, we will ignore the transshipment scenario where the cargo comes in on maritime ships and also leaves on maritime ships from and to destinations that are not considered part of the hinterland of the port. The supply chain events that occur outside the boundaries of gate in and gate out mentioned above are not in scope for this document. It is recognised that the transport-related operations covered in the scope of this document are an integral part of the end-to-end supply chain between seller and buyer. Therefore, the requirements outlined in this document will follow standards and "best practices" already in use in the supply chain. This is also driven by the fact that there are critical hand-overs between the wider supply chain and the operations in scope for this document at the gate in and gate out processes that require unambiguous exchange of information related to the critical events in those processes.

 

This document provides guidance for data collection and validation for the calculation of the carbon footprint for lithium products. This document encourages disclosure of the databases, software, yields, distribution methods and data quality rating used in the calculation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions when producing lithium products from various lithium resources and produced by various processes, including its distribution, in order to verify the calculated values of GHG emissions. This document is not intended for the disclosure of GHG emissions for individual stages of the product manufacturing process.

 

This document specifies the performance criteria and requirements of a three-way connection interface, including ground connection, linking the pyrotechnic device and harness connector built into a road vehicle. Performance criteria and requirements are defined for a sealed variant of the pyrotechnic device/initiator harness connector assembly (see Annex A). Performance criteria and requirements are defined for a two-way (without ground) variant of the pyrotechnic device/initiator harness connector assembly (see Annex B). Performance criteria and requirements are defined for a variant without a retainer of the pyrotechnic device/initiator harness connector assembly is defined (see Annex C).

 

This document defines the minimum specification of the pyrotechnic device pocket interface.

 

This document defines the general minimum specifications of a type 2 two-way connection interface, linking the pyrotechnic device and harness connector built into a road vehicle.

 

The proposed standard contains six grades of praseodymium-neodymium metal. It specifies the classifications, chemical compositions, appearance quality, markings and other requirements for praseodymium-neodymium metal. It includes a table of related grades of praseodymium-neodymium metal which are recognized in worldwide industrial applications. This International Standard is applicable to praseodymium-neodymium metal prepared by molten salt electrolysis process only and does not include requirements for praseodymium-neodymium metal produced by re-melting or other technology methods.

 

This document establishes minimum performance, classification, and labelling requirements for gloves worn by operators and re-entry workers handling pesticide products to protect the hands or hands and forearms against contact with those products. Gloves covered by this document include gloves made with elastomeric and polymeric materials in the areas that provide protection. This document does not address protection against fumigants. This document needs to be used in conjunction with ISO 21420.

 

This document specifies a device and a method for the determination of the image quality of radiographs using wire-type image quality indicators.

 

This document provides a temporal management reference model for feature-based software and systems product line engineering (feature-based PLE) as defined in ISO/IEC 26580:2021, expanding on the basic configuration management operations, tasks, and methods specified there. Because a PLE factory in ISO/IEC 26580 aggregates shared assets across multiple lifecycle stages and tools, such as requirements, models, source code, mechanical design, electrical design, documentation, test cases, calibration data, and so forth, the version management capabilities of the different lifecycle disciplines, as well as the feature catalogue and bill-of-features portfolio, need to be integrated into a holistic solution. We refer to this integrated PLE factory solution as Temporal Management (TM). As the name implies, the scope of temporal management is product line variation in time, in the context of feature-based PLE as prescribed in ISO/IEC 26580. The reference model for temporal management specifies an alignment-of-systems, where the temporal management system is an aggregation of the constituent version management systems for each of the individual elements in a PLE factory, including shared assets across all lifecycle stages, the feature catalogue, and the bills-of-features. Version management for each of the individual elements in the PLE factory is handled by the version management tools and methods associated with each of the elements, which are elaborated elsewhere and not repeated in this document.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][10][11] Appendix A provides harmonization with this document and these representative version management methods, in the context of broader systems and software configuration management standards. Organizations may incorporate an overall temporal management approach for their temporal management solution that best matches their engineering processes, such as ASME Y14.35[5] and ASME Y14.100[6] for organizations primarily focused on mechanical engineering processes or IEEE Std 828[4] for organizations primarily focused on systems and software engineering processes. The intended audience for this document comprises: — technology providers who wish to provide temporal management for their feature-based PLE factory; — champions within an organization who wish to introduce feature-based PLE into their organization; — IT staff within a PLE organization who introduce and maintain the necessary technology to support temporal management in feature-based PLE; — practitioner stakeholders who use the temporal management tools and methods to practice feature-based PLE; — technical and business managers who sponsor and direct the methods necessary to practice temporal management in feature-based PLE; — university professors, researchers, corporate trainers, and other educators who create and share pedagogical materials and benefits regarding temporal management in feature-based PLE.

 

This document describes a test method applicable to cast test specimens for evaluating the Sulfate Resistance (SR characteristic) of cements. Sulfate resistance means that these binders can be used in concrete bodies submitted to sulfate attacks. In these methods, the test is carried out under controlled exposure conditions using a defined concentration of sulfate solution. The chosen test conditions are intended to accelerate external sulfate attack. This test method is appropriate in particular for CEM III/A cements and other various binders, in particular those with pozzolanic main constituents. It is adapted from the CUR - NL - Civieltechnisch Centrum Uitvoering Research en Regelgeving (Centre for Civil Engineering Research and Codes) - Recommendation 48 - Suitability test for new cements for application in concrete. This test method is listed in European Assessment Document - EAD 150004-00-0301, Annex B.

 

This document describes test methods (reference and alternative) applicable to cast test specimens for evaluating the Sulftate Resistance (SR characteristic) of cements. Sulfate resistance means that these binders can be used in concrete bodies submitted to sulfate attacks. In these methods, the test is carried out under controlled exposure conditions using an increased concentration of sulfate solution. These test conditions are intended to accelerate external sulfate attack. The reference test method is adapted from the modified SVA test method (German Institute for Building Technology (DIBt), Expert Committee (SVA)): “Testing the Sulfate Resistance of Cements with pozzolanic main constituents”. The modified SVA test method is listed in European Assessment Document – EAD 150007-01-0301, Annex C. This test method is appropriate for various binders, in particular those with pozzolanic main constituents. The alternative test method is listed in European Assessment Document – EAD 150009-01-0301, Annex A. This test method is appropriate for CEM III/A cements.

 

This document specifies the “as-built” data used for demonstrating completion of the build process and conformity of the product to type design. This document defines the minimum set of information to be archived to serve as a complete representation of an organization’s as-built data.

 

This document specifies the characteristics of tab washers for flight control rods. These tab washers are intended to immobilise the rod end in relation to the rod body, whilst allowing a positional adjustment of 1/2 a turn.

 

This document establishes the basis for testing and classifying free-standing safes, safe plinths, built-in safes (floor and wall), ATM safes and ATM bases, strongroom doors and strongrooms (with or without a door) according to their burglary resistance. This document does not cover testing and classifying Deposit Systems and ATM systems.

 

1.1 This International Standard contains principles and requirements for the competence, consistency and impartiality of the certification of products (including services; see clause 3.3 of ISO/IEC 17000) and processes and for the bodies providing those activities. Certification bodies operating to this International Standard need not offer all types of product, service or process certification. 1.2 Certification of products, services and processes is a third party conformity assessment activity (see clause 5.5 of ISO/IEC 17000:2004). Bodies performing this activity are therefore third party conformity assessment bodies, (named in this standard "certification body/bodies"). Note 1 A certification body can be non-governmental or governmental (with or without regulatory authority). Note 2 This International Standard can be used as a criteria document for accreditation or peer assessment or other assessment processes.

 

This document specifies additional requirements to ISO/IEC 17021-1. The requirements contained in this document, when implemented, support the demonstration of competence, consistency and reliability by the bodies performing auditing and certification of an artificial intelligence management system (AIMS) according to ISO/IEC 42001 for organizations that provide, develop or use AI systems. Certification of AIMS is a third-party conformity assessment activity (as described in ISO/IEC 17000:2020, 4.5), and bodies performing this activity are third-party conformity assessment bodies. This document also provides the necessary information and confidence to customers about the way certification has been granted. NOTE This document can be used as a criteria document for accreditation or peer assessment.

 

Tämä dokumentti on DRM-suojattu. DRM-suojattujen tiedostojen lukemiseen on välttämätöntä asentaa koneelle ilmainen FileOpen-liitännäinen (FileOpen plug-in). Jos sinulla ei ole oikeutta asentaa ohjelmia omalle päätelaitteellesi, ota yhteyttä oman organisaatiosi IT-tukeen. FileOpen liitännäisen saat ladattua osoitteessa http://plugin.fileopen.com/all.aspx. Onnistuneen asennuksen jälkeen avaa standardiehdotus Acrobat Readerilla, jotta lisäosa toimii oikein.