Toimialayhteisöt

 

This document specifies requirements for flat products for pressure purposes made of stainless steels, including austenitic creep-resisting steels, in thicknesses as specified in Tables 7 to 10. The requirements and definitions of ISO 9328-1 also apply to this document.

 

This document defines several subsets of the syntax specified in ISO/IEC 21122-1 as profiles. It also defines lower bounds on the throughput in the decoded domain via levels and the encoded domain via sublevels that a conforming decoder implementation shall support. Furthermore, it defines a buffer model to ensure interoperability between implementations in the presence of a latency constraint.

 

This standard applies to the chemical analysis of oxidic abrasives consisting of one or more of following oxides: alumina, zirconia, magnesia, titania, silica, chromium oxide, calcium oxide, iron oxide, sodium oxide, potassium oxide and rare earth oxides.

 

This document deals with the chemical analysis of abrasive grains or crude based on fused aluminium oxide. lt applies to commercially available products but not necessarily to products which have been altered by use. lt includes the following determinations: Loss on ignition — Silicon dioxide — lron oxide — Titanium dioxide — Calcium oxide — Magnesium oxide — Zirconium oxide — Aluminium oxide — Chromium oxide

 

This document specifies requirements and considerations for handling, measuring, and storing samples with ultra-low concentration of target nucleic acid sequences, i.e., concentrations corresponding to copy numbers. This document is applicable to nucleic acid detection methods (qPCR, dPCR, isothermal amplification, and NGS).

 

This standard specifies the purpose, principle, timing, indicators and process of design and verification for diagnosability and reconfigurability of spacecraft. This standard is applicable to evaluate and design of diagnosability and reconfigurability in the whole life cycle including mainly the stages of ground design and working in-orbit. The evaluation and design of diagnosability and reconfigurability in other stage can also be referred to the implementation. This standard focuses on the subsystem of spacecraft can be reconfigured after a fault occurs, such as attitude and orbit control subsystem, power subsystem and TT&C subsystem.

 

This document provides guidelines for crowd management at events, mass gatherings and crowded places. It is designed to assist event organizers, event rights holders, event hosts, venue operators and emergency services in planning and executing effective, successful and safe crowd management by ensuring:

 

- implementation of the framework and principles for crowd management;

- necessary event and crowd profiling to understand the crowd management risk;

- available spaces for expected crowds using crowd capacity assessments;

- sufficient crowd management in the ingress, event circulation, and egress phases;

- safe and secure venues, spaces, and pathways for crowds in all phases and situations;

- sufficient crowd management plans both for planned execution and in emergencies;

- necessary engagement and involvement of public and private interested parties;

- continual improvement through systematic evaluation of crowd management arrangements.

 

This document does not address crowd control or situations that require intervention to manage crowds that display undesirable or dangerous behaviours.

 

____________________________________________________

 

 

This International Standard establishes technical requirements and guidelines for the quality assurance of COTS EEE components, ensuring that performance, quality, schedule, cost and other critical requirements are met throughout the entire life cycle of space mission. The family includes electro-optical components. This standard does not cover specific test items for different types of components.

 

The document specifies DLT related requirements for establishing, improving, preserving, and assessing the privacy capability of a DLT system. The target audience of the document includes but is not limited to developers, providers, users and auditors of DLT system. It will be especially useful for the controllers and processors holding responsibility and accountability for privacy protected data processing.

 

The scope of JPEG Trust Part 2 is to elaborate on Trust Profiles and Trust Reports, which are built on the Trust Indicators specified in JPEG Trust Part 1. In addition, JPEG Trust Part 2 provides a catalogue of snippets that can be used either on their own or in combination for the purpose of constructing trust profiles, which can be used for assessing the trustworthiness of media assets in given usage scenarios.

 

This document specifies the requirements for the HSI 1000BASE-T1 communication channel used to connect machines, attachments and expansion kits within an HSI infrastructure. This document specifies general, mechanical, environmental and electrical requirements for: HSI communication channels; HSI cable assemblies; HSI cables; HSI connectors.

 

This document specifies the requirements for the HSI single communication channel coupling connector system used to connect machines, attachments and expansion kits within an HSI infrastructure. This document specifies: The HSI single communication channel coupling plug, break-away connector and expansion connector; Functional, stylistic, geometric, mounting, mechanical, material and electrical requirements; Conformance testing of the HSI single communication channel coupling connector system.

 

This document specifies an analytical method for determining the neptunium concentration by spectrophotometry, with spectrophotometer implemented in hot cell or glove box allowing the analysis of high activity solutions, with a standard uncertainty, with coverage factor k = 1 of about 5 %, in nitric acid solutions after the dissolution of nuclear reactor irradiated fuels, at different steps of the process in a nuclear fuel reprocessing plant or in other nuclear facilities. The method is applicable to sample from the process containing a concentration of neptunium between 10 mg·l-1 and 400 mg·l-1 and uranium concentrations of up to 300 g·l-1.

 

This document applies to the testing of surfaces that may become contaminated by radioactive materials. The ease of decontamination is a property of a surface and an important criterion for selecting surface materials used in the nuclear industry, interim storage or disposal facilities from which contamination can be removed easily and rapidly without damaging the surface. The test described in this document is a rapid laboratory-based method to compare the ease of decontamination of different surface materials. The results from the test can be one parameter to take into account when selecting surface coatings such as varnish or impervious layers such as ceramics and other surfaces. The radionuclides used in this test are those commonly found in the nuclear industry (137Cs, 134Cs and 60Co) in aqueous form. The test can also be adopted for use with other radionuclides and other chemical forms, depending on the customer requirements, if the solutions are chemically stable and do not corrode the test specimen. The test does not measure the ease of decontamination of the surface materials in practical use, as this depends on the radionuclide(s) present, their chemical form, the duration of exposure to the contaminant and the environmental conditions amongst other factors. The test method is not intended to describe general decontamination procedures or to assess the efficiency of decontamination procedures (see ISO 7503-1 to ISO 7503-3). The test method is not suitable for use of radiochemicals if the radionuclide emits low energy gamma rays or beta particles that are readily attenuated in the surface.

 

This document describes an analytical method for the determination of uranium in samples from pure product materials such as U metal, UO2, UO3, uranyl nitrate hexahydrate, uranium hexafluoride and U3O8 from the nuclear fuel cycle. This procedure is sufficiently accurate and precise to be used for nuclear materials accountability. This method can be used directly for the analysis of most uranium and uranium oxide nuclear reactor fuels, either irradiated or un-irradiated, and of uranium nitrate product solutions. Fission products equivalent to up to 10 % burn-up of heavy atoms do not interfere, and other elements which could cause interference are not normally present in sufficient quantity to affect the result significantly. The method recommends that an aliquot of sample is weighed and that a mass titration is used, in order to obtain improved precision and accuracy. This does not preclude the use of alternative techniques which could give equivalent performance. The use of automatic device(s) in the performance of some critical steps of the method has some advantages, mainly in the case of routine analysis.

 

This document describes an analytical method for the determination of uranium in samples from pure product materials such as U metal, UO2, UO3, U3O8, uranyl nitrate hexahydrate and uranium hexafluoride from the nuclear fuel cycle. This procedure is sufficiently accurate and precise to be used for nuclear materials accountability. This method can be used directly for the analysis of most uranium and uranium oxide nuclear reactor fuels, either irradiated or un-irradiated, and of uranium nitrate product solutions. Fission products equivalent to up to 10 % burn-up of heavy atoms do not interfere, and other elements which could cause interference are not normally present in sufficient quantity to affect the result significantly. The method recommends that an aliquot of sample is weighed and that a mass titration is used, in order to obtain improved precision and accuracy. This does not preclude the use of alternative techniques which could give equivalent performance. The use of automatic device(s) in the performance of some critical steps of the method has some advantages, mainly in the case of routine analysis.

 

This document specifies requirements and gives recommendations for the design, installation, water supplies and backflow prevention, commissioning, maintenance and testing of fixed residential fire sprinkler systems in buildings for residential occupancies. This document is intended for use by those concerned with purchasing, designing, installing, testing, inspecting, approving, operating and maintaining automatic residential sprinkler systems, in order that such equipment will function as intended throughout its life. This document identifies construction details of buildings which are the minimum necessary for satisfactory performance of residential sprinkler systems complying with this standard. This document applies to any addition, extension, repair or other modification to the residential sprinkler system. This document does not cover situations such as arson where fires of a malicious intent may be started in multiple locations simultaneously.

 

This document specifies requirements and test methods to ensure absolute sealing of compressed gaseous hydrogen piping for gaseous hydrogen fuel cell–powered unmanned aircraft systems (HFC UAS). It applies to all piping—from the hydrogen storage cylinder through to the fuel cell—such that no hydrogen leakage occurs under normal operation, transient conditions, or fault scenarios. Compliance with these requirements enables HFC UAS operators and regulatory authorities to demonstrate and certify the absence of any hydrogen gas leaks, thereby ensuring flight safety.

 

This document specifies the required performance of attachable hydrogen cylinders for HFC UAS with power pack hydrogen fuel cell systems. This document specifies the minimum safety, performance, and integrity requirements for attachable hydrogen cylinders, which are key components of hydrogen fuel cell powered unmanned aircraft systems (HFC UAS), to ensure safe flight and intended performance. It is applicable only to systems in which the hydrogen fuel cell power generation system is unitized as a power pack.

 

This document describes methods and requirements for proof of delivery replacing the physical signature, while being as secure and trustworthy as physical signatures. It applies to situations where the traditional, physical signature is required by the service to be provided and where this traditional physical signature is not required by regulation. It applies to parcels delivered to recipients by postal operators and Logistic Service Providers (LSP). This document aims to meet or exceed the level of confidence associated with traditional, physical signatures. The new proof of delivery process will ascertain that the item is delivered to an authorized recipient or receiver and also prove that the recipient accepted the delivery. This document includes only the delivery process (forward flow).